Remembrance Day is an occasion to think
about the importance of peace. It commemorates the end of the First World War,
which lasted four years and resulted in the deaths of an estimated 20 million
people. It was followed barely twenty years later by the Second World War,
which caused the death of an estimated 65 million people.
These figures are difficult for us to
comprehend today. Consider that this means an average of about 23,000 deaths
every single day over the ten years of the two conflicts. Also bear in mind
that in the first half of the twentieth century the population of the globe was
about 30 to 35% of what it is today. In other words, in equivalent 2012
numbers, there were about 70,000 deaths daily.
That is more than double the number reported
to have died in the Syrian conflict since February 2011. This is not to suggest
that the number of killings in Syria is not appalling, merely to put the
overall amount in perspective.
The point – something Stephen Pinker has
made so eloquently in his book The Better Angels of Our Nature – is that the
world is less violent than in was. The likelihood of dying a violent death
continues to decline, even if there are still parts of the world that are very
dangerous indeed.
Why is this? International law has made
an important contribution. The Charter of the United Nations prohibited resort
to force to settle disputes. The judgment of the International Military
Tribunal recognized crimes against peace to be an international offence.
Very recently, after some hesitation,
the States Parties to the Rome Statute completed the necessary codification of
the crime of aggression. When the amendments enter into force in 2017 the
International Criminal Court will be able to prosecute the crime of aggression.
This is an important process that fits squarely within the progressive law
making of the past 65 years aimed at the prohibition of war.
Peace is fundamental to the protection
of human rights. Freedom from fear is the fourth of Roosevelt’s famous four
freedoms. Unfortunately, the place of the right to peace within human rights
law is still contested.
Recently, I was contacted by a former
high school friend who is organising a reunion of the class of 1968. He sent me
a list of those I was at secondary school with, and I was saddened to see that
several of them had passed away. Perhaps ten out of 230. Contrast that with the
schools attended by my parents and my grandparents, where an entire generation
was decimated by world war.
The photo shows a plaque that was
unveiled last week in the Cooper Gallery, in Barnsley, Yorkshire. The building once housed Holgate Grammar School, where my
maternal grandfather and his brother went to school. Seventy-five of the boys
lost their lives in the First World War, including my great uncle Duncan
Fairley, whose name is on the plaque. Duncan was a second lieutenant who was
fatally wounded on the morning of 1 July 1916, the opening day of the Battle of
the Somme, in northern France. That day, the British army suffered 60,000
casualties, the largest in its history, as waves of young men, my great uncle
among them, marched across the muddy fields to be mown down by artillery and
machine gun fire. I am grateful to Sally Hayes for the photograph.
No comments:
Post a Comment